|
|
Resolution 1364 (2004)[1], Provisional Edition
Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly
Strasbourg, France, January 29, 2004
|
[NOTE: The following resolution was adopted January 29 by a vote of 46
in favor and 13 against.]
|

|
1. The Assembly is deeply troubled by the recent developments in
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine relating to the consideration of the draft law on
amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine and in this context refers to its
Resolutions 1179 (1999), 1239 (2001), 1244 (2001), 1346 (2003) and in
particular to Recommendation 1451 (2000) on the institutional reform in
Ukraine. It notes that recently a procedure has been initiated, which is
not in compliance with the Rules of Procedure of the Verkhovna Rada or
Article 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine.
2. The Assembly deeply regrets that the Ukrainian authorities,
including the President of Ukraine and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
consider the activities of the Council of Europe, namely the Assembly's
monitoring procedure, the visits of the co-rapporteurs of the Monitoring
Committee and their statements as "interference in the internal affairs of
Ukraine".
In this regard, it recalls that Ukraine has voluntarily accepted the
obligations arising from its membership according to the Statute of the
Council of Europe. Therefore, the Assembly finds such a stand of the
Ukrainian authorities groundless and unjustified.
3. The Assembly supports any sincere aspirations by both the
executive and the legislative authorities of Ukraine to pursue democratic
reforms that would aim at substantially strengthening the legislative power
and enhancing the independence of the judiciary, thus contributing to a
greater separation of powers and an improved system of checks and balances
as required by the standards of the Council of Europe.
4. The nature of the reforms as well as the system of governance
chosen is an internal affair of any sovereign state, but only as long as
they are carried out with due respect to the fundamental law of the country.
5. In this respect, the Assembly reiterates that the current
Constitution in force since 1996 constitutes the main domestic legal
instrument on the basis of which the country can develop a genuine democracy
and insists on strict respect of its provisions, in particular as regards
amendments to the Constitution, whatever their necessity and
appropriateness.
6. Within this context, the Assembly is convinced that any decision
reforming the constitutional election rules taken on the eve of Presidential
elections is likely to be biased and divisive and therefore considers the
timing of the current debate on constitutional reform highly inappropriate.
7. The Assembly strongly regrets the fact that the crisis in the
Verkhovna Rada has been sparked by lack of discussion of the officially
registered draft amendments to the Constitution. The Assembly finds that
such practices are inappropriate in a democratic state guided by the
principles of the rule of law.
8. At the same time, it deplores the means the opposition has
resorted to in retaliation in order to block the regular work of parliament.
9. The Assembly refers to the opinion of the European Commission for
Democracy through Law ("Venice Commission") adopted on 13 December 2003
which welcomed the efforts made for the reforming of the system of
government to bring the Ukrainian system closer to European democratic
standards but concluded that "the precise solutions chosen in the various
drafts do not yet seem to have attained that aim and introduce other
amendments to the Constitution that would appear to be a step backwards".
10. The Assembly deplores the fact that none of the recommendations
of the Venice Commission have been taken into account in the course of the
revision of the three Draft Laws (n° 3207-1, 4105 and 4180) by the
Constitutional Court of Ukraine nor by the ad hoc parliamentary
Constitutional Committee before submitting the Draft Law N° 4105 for
discussion in the Verkhovna Rada. The Assembly therefore urges the relevant
Ukrainian authorities to take into account all recommendations made so far
by the Venice Commission and to continue to hold an open and effective
dialogue with the Commission with a view to further improving the draft laws
currently under debate.
11. The Assembly launches an urgent appeal to the parties and blocks,
to parliamentary factions and groups represented in the Verkhovna Rada to
resolve their problems in a peaceful manner through an open dialogue and
full respect for parliamentary rules and regulations by means of:
i. securing the legitimacy of any constitutional reform by
admitting that, in this instance, the Rules of Procedure of the Verkhovna
Rada failed to be respected by all parties concerned, taking into account
that "voting by raising hands" in parliament is not provided for by law,
including the Rules of Procedure;
ii. proceeding to an open debate on all three Draft Laws (n°
3207-1, 4105 and 4180) on constitutional amendments which would involve
a proper public information and a nation-wide popular discussion on these
issues, especially pluralistic political debates on national TV and Radio
channels;
iii. fully taking into account the recommendations of the
Venice Commission while amending the Constitution and in particular
reconsidering their position regarding the imperative mandate of national
deputies, the limitation to ten years of the judges' tenure and the
extension of the mandate of the Prosecutor General, which all conflict
with the principles of democracy and the rule of law;
iv. ensuring that the next presidential election be held as
scheduled and for the term prescribed in the current Constitution, in view
of the fact that changing the election modalities immediately before the
elections are due can only but confuse the electorate;
v. agreeing to submit any constitutional changes relating to
the term and mode of election of a president to a nation-wide referendum
as provided in Article 156 of the Constitution in force.
12. The recent rulings of the Constitutional Court have once again
shown the vulnerability of the independence of the judiciary in Ukraine. In
the earnest belief that only a fully independent judiciary can provide the
stability that is necessary to establish the rule of law, the Assembly is
concerned by the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 25
December 2003 (N° 22-rp) as it corresponds neither to the present nor to the
previous Constitution of Ukraine in force when President Kuchma was first
elected in 1994.
The Assembly still hopes that the President of Ukraine will demonstrate
democratic responsibility by stepping down at the end of his second term as
foreseen by the Constitution of Ukraine.
13. With regard to the forthcoming Presidential elections in October
2004, the Assembly shares the concern of many Ukrainian citizens that the
election may not be truly free, fair, open and transparent. It maintains
that any form of authoritarian practices like intimidation of voters,
pressures on elections commissioners, curtailing the freedom of expression
or bias of the media in favour of some candidates of the ruling political
forces is clearly unacceptable. When full respect has been given to all
these elements, the outcome of the elections also has to be respected.
14. The Assembly calls upon the President of Ukraine to submit in the
nearest future the proposed candidates to fill the seats in the Central
Electoral Commission which are vacant since the expiry of the mandate of the
former incumbents.
15. In the light of the above findings, the Assembly calls upon the
Secretary General of the Council of Europe to urgently appoint a Special
Representative in Ukraine whose mandate should be to follow current
political developments in Ukraine, to provide advice and Council of Europe
expertise if and when needed and generally to enhance and co-ordinate the
ongoing co-operation with Ukrainian authorities.
16. It also considers that the activities relating to the Council of
Europe media action plan agreed with Ukraine should be stepped up in order
to achieve a noticeable improvement of the general framework in which media
operate and to promote substantial changes in the media culture in view of
the forthcoming election campaign.
17. The Assembly is also concerned about the recent events in the
town of Mukachevo concerning elections of the mayor and urges to resolve
this problem in accordance with the legislation of Ukraine. The Assembly
recommends that the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the
Council of Europe undertake the monitoring mission over the future elections
of mayor in the town of Mukachevo aiming at free and impartial elections.
18. The Assembly is of the opinion that the recent infringements of
the voting procedures in the Verkhovna Rada violate Ukraine's obligations
under Article 3 of the Statute of the Council of Europe. If any further
attempts should be made to push through political reforms by amending the
Constitution in a manner which is not prescribed by law and by
unconstitutional means, or if Ukraine should fail to guarantee free and fair
elections on 31 October 2004, the Assembly may decide to challenge the
credentials of the Ukrainian Delegation in accordance with Rule 9 of the
Assembly's Rules of Procedure and subsequently may decide to request the
Committee of Ministers to suspend the membership of Ukraine in the Council
of Europe in accordance with Article 8 of the Statute of the Council of
Europe.
19. The Assembly will continue to closely follow the developments in
Ukraine and stands ready to contribute to an effective dialogue between the
political forces represented in the Verkhovna Rada.
[1] Assembly debate on 29 January 2004 (7th sitting) (see Doc.10058, report
of the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member
States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee), Co-Rapporteurs: Mrs
Severinsen and Mrs Wohlwend). Text adopted by the Assembly on 29 January
2004 (7th Sitting) .
|
EDITOR'S NOTE: REPORT OF THE MONITORING COMMITTEE:
To read a copy of the entire Report (Doc. 10058, 27 January 2004) of the
Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member
States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Rapporteurs: Mrs
Hanne Severinsen, Denmark, Liberal, Democratic and Reformers' Group, and Mrs
Renate Wohlwend, Liechtenstein, Group of the European People's Party and
the draft resolution click on:
http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/doc04/EDOC10058.htm
EDITOR'S NOTE: FINAL ADOPTED RESOLUTION :
The link to the final resolution [shown above] that was adopted is:
http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=http%3A%2F%2Fassembly.coe.int%2FDocuments%2FAdoptedText%2FTA04%2FERES1364.htm.
|
|