| |
By Taras Kuzio
The Kyiv Post, Kyiv, Ukraine
October 3, 2002
Ukraine's ambiguous relationship to its Soviet past is nowhere more apparent
than on the streets of downtown Kyiv.
A small monument to the artificial famine of 1932-33, which caused upwards
of 7 million deaths in Ukraine, has stood on Mykhailivska Square in central
Kyiv for over a decade. However, it was not until 2000 that the hammer and
sickle insignia was finally removed from the facade of the parliament
building. To this day, a similar insignia remains prominently visible on a
building overlooking Independence Square. The massive Lenin statue that
formerly dominated the square (when it was still named after October) was
quickly removed after independence and has now been replaced by a grandiose
monument to independence. At the other end of Khreshchatyk, though, a
smaller, "more artistic" Lenin statue continues to preside over Bessarabsky
Square.
In fact, statues of Lenin still stand in countless Ukrainian towns. The
"Black Book of Communism. Crimes, Terror, Repression" published in France in
1997 and then by Harvard in 1999 provided evidence that the victims of Lenin
's party exceeded those of the Nazis. While neo-Nazi parties are banned in
Germany, a fifth of Ukrainians still vote for the Communists. The Soviet
system has never been denounced in total, the way the Nazis were in Germany
and Austria. In fact, this would probably be impossible given the former
Soviet Ukrainian nomenklatura still rules Ukraine.
More than a decade after the USSR collapsed, dealing with Soviet crimes
against humanity - an issue first raised in the glasnost era of the late
1980s - remains unfinished business.
Soviet famine denial
In an open letter to Mikhail Gorbachev in August 1987, the veteran dissident
Vyachaslav Chornovil wrote, "The biggest and most infamous blank spot in the
Soviet history of Ukraine is the hollow silence for over 50 years about the
genocide of the Ukrainian nation organized by Stalin and his henchmen ...
The Great Famine of 1932-33, which took millions of human lives. In one
year - 1933 - my people lost more than throughout all of World War II, which
ravaged our land."
Not surprisingly, the Communist Party of Ukraine was unwilling to come to
terms with the famine. In a speech devoted to the 70th anniversary of Soviet
rule in Ukraine, CPU leader Volodymyr Shcherbytsky admitted that famine had
occurred as a consequence of collectivization, but he attributed the
"serious food problems" to an "unforeseen drought." Only in 1990 did the
CPU, admit that the famine had taken place - and to this day, it denies that
it was the result of deliberate policy.
During the Gorbachev era, it was liberal Moscow publications such as Ogonyok
that first covered the famine as a "man-made" Stalinist crime. Yury
Shcherbak, then head of the Green World Association and now Ambassador to
Canada, said in a 1988 interview: "The famine of 1932-33 was definitely not
due to any natural disasters. There was no drought, no hurricanes which
could have provided the reason." In his view, there was no doubt that "the
famine was organized from above."
The Writers Union of Ukraine produced the most revealing accounts of the
famine and Great Terror. In early 1988, the famine was first described as a
"holodomor" (terror famine) directed at the peasants and leading to a
"holocaust of millions." The famine was followed by the "Great Terror,"
which targeted the cultural-political elites who had spearheaded
Ukrainianization in the 1920s.
At the time, the poet Borys Oliynyk called for the publication of a "white
book," in which "not only is Stalin fully exposed with stenographic clarity
and precision, but also the degree of guilt of every member of his coterie
is defined, and not only are the victims identified by name, but those who
planned and carried out illegal acts."
The confusion surrounding attitudes to the Soviet past in post-Soviet
Ukraine is exemplified in Oliynyk himself. He continues to be a member of
the Communist Party, which consistently ignores the famine and other
Stalinist crimes. Not surprisingly, Ukraine's post-Soviet authorities have
never published a "white book."
Western denial
It was not only the Communist Party of the Soviet Union that denied - and
whose successors continue to deny - that artificial famine had killed
millions of Ukrainians, Kazakhs and others in 1932-33. Right through to the
late 1980s - and in some cases still now - Western textbooks of Soviet
history and politics tended to ignore the famine and downplay the brutality
of the Soviet collectivization campaign. Some of the authors were simply
apologists of Stalinism. Others were admirers of the "progressive" nature of
the USSR. Bedazzled by the achievements of Soviet modernization in the
1930s, they would admit only begrudgingly that some "unfortunate mistakes"
were made. To this day, many scholars continue to play down the total
numbers murdered under Stalinism and deny Ukrainians were targeted in the
famine. The peasants died not because they were Ukrainian, but because they
were peasants - and anyway the famine struck throughout the USSR.
Even after the Gorbachev-era Soviet press published death toll figures for
the 1930s which exceeded Robert Conquest's conservative estimates in his
"Harvest of Sorrow. Soviet Collectivization and the Terror Famine," the book
was dismissed as "rubbish" by Moshe Lewin, an American academic. Alexander
Dallin, who many view as the father of modern Soviet studies, dismissed the
idea that the famine was artificially planned. Writing in the New Republic
in 1986, Alec Nove, a respected expert on the Soviet economy, accused
Conquest of "accepting the Ukrainian nationalist myth."
The widespread antipathy for Conquest among mainstream academics echoed the
views of Western Communists such as Canadian Douglas Tottle, who wrote
"Fraud, Famine and Fascism. The Ukrainian Genocide Myth From Hitler to
Harvard" during the late 1980s. Writers in New York's Village Voice and the
London Review of Books claimed that the mythical famine was part of the
anti-communist campaign against the Soviet Union unleashed by Ronald Reagan.
Conquest's book was placed on a par with Hollywood films like "Rambo" and
"Red Dawn."
Although Stalinism is undoubtedly a discredited ideology, few in Ukraine or
the West wish to equate it with Nazism. Western academics still see Nazism
as intrinsically evil, while insisting communism always had good intentions.
Soviet crimes against humanity are the fault of "Stalinism" or "mistakes,"
not the Communist Party or Marxist-Leninist ideology.
Counting the cost
Discussion of the famine and Great Terror in the Gorbachev era press
produced a wide range of death toll estimates. Dissident historian Roy
Medvedev believed a fifth of the Soviet population, 38 million people,
suffered under Stalinism. Of these, 12 million died, including 6 million in
the famine in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the North Caucasus and Volga region.
Another 10 million were deported or dekulakised. Other figures gave 25
million dead or imprisoned before 1935 and the same number from 1935-1953, a
total of 50 million dead and repressed. Conquest gave the total dead
resulting from the famine and dekulakisation as 14.5 million, 80 percent of
whom were in Ukraine. New research in the 1990s produced even higher
figures.
During the 1930s, the population of the Russian SFSR increased by 28
percent. In the same period, the Ukrainian population lost upward of 10
million people, 5-7 million due to the famine. According to demographic
projections, Ukraine's population should have reached 38 million by 1939.
The results of the falsified Soviet census of 1939 showed only 31 million.
Accordingly, Ukraine's population growth in the twentieth century has been
much slower than Russia's. By the 1989 Soviet census, ethnic Ukrainians
represented only 40 out of the Ukrainian SSR's 52 million (12 million
Russians had migrated to Ukraine during the Soviet era). Since 1992, the
population has declined by another 3 million. The left accuse Ukraine's new
ruling elite of a new "genocide," but they refuse to acknowledge guilt for
the 1932-33 famine.
Stalinism and Soviet nationality policies produced a divided Ukraine and a
hobbled peasantry. While Ukrainians were demographically dominant in all
urban centers, they were culturally dominant only in western regions.
Stalinism also ethnically cleansed the Ukrainian presence from the Kuban
region of the North Caucasus. Since the 1930s, Sovietization and
Russification in eastern Ukraine has produced a passive population where
civic activity is low and oligarchs hold sway, opposed only by the hard line
Communists. It is not coincidental that three out of four opposition forces
(Our Ukraine, Yulia Tymoshenko and the Socialists) have their roots in the
more active, nationally conscious and less sovietized western and central
Ukraine.
Punishing Soviet crimes
Calls by writers in the late Soviet era for those who were responsible for
Stalinism to be brought to trial have fallen on deaf ears. Lazar Kaganovich,
one of the Soviet leaders closest to Stalin in the 1930s, was allowed to
live in peace and obscurity in Moscow until his death in 1991 at the age of
98. Medvedev wrote, "He had quite as many crimes on his conscience as those
hanged at Nuremberg."
The only former Soviet countries to have put former members of the secret
police on trial are Latvia and Estonia. This has provoked a furious reaction
from Russia, which has itself been exhibiting an increasingly confused
attitude to the Soviet past since it adopted the old Soviet anthem with new
lyrics.
Back in the Gorbachev era, Ukrainian writer Volodymyr Musienko called upon
his countrymen to "clear themselves of the nuclei of slavery that have eaten
their way into the cellular tissue of our bones, of the slime of conscious
deceit, of fear, servility and lack of self-esteem." Nearly two decades
after Gorbachev introduced perestroika and glasnost in the USSR, this worthy
call has still to be acted upon by Ukraine's leaders.
Dr. Taras Kuzio is a resident fellow in the Centre for Russian and East
European Studies, and adjunct professor in the Department of Political
Science, University of Toronto.
To read the original article please click on:
http://www.kpnews.com/main/11963/
ArtUkraine Information Service (ARTUIS)
E. Morgan Williams, Publisher
Kyiv, Ukraine and Washington, D.C.
ArtUkraine@starpower.net
http://www.ArtUkraine.com
"The Art of the Long, Bitter, Struggle for Independence"
|
|
back
