The Great Famine-Genocide in Soviet Ukraine (Holodomor)

  back    
THE 1932-33 FAMINE-GENOCIDE: UKRAINE SPEAKS OUT
  

The ROMYR Report: Ukraine, Political Analysis Quarterly
Spring-Summer 2003, No. 1 (15), Page 17
Romyr & Associates, ROMYR Public Relations
Kyiv, Ukraine; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; New York, New York

This year is the 70th anniversary of the 1932-33 famine-genocide in Ukraine. Ten years ago, on the 60th anniversary, public commemoration of this greatest tragedy in the history of the people of Ukraine was limited to condemnations expressed by President Leonid Krawchuk, a few Members of Parliament and senior government officials. On the 65th anniversary, President Kuchma issued a Decree designating the fourth Saturday of November as a memorial day for honouring the "victims of the holodomor" (famine-terror) - amended October 31, 2000 to include both "victims of the holodomor and political repressions of 1932-33." These declarations had little impact on many Ukrainians. The horrific events of 1932-33 either remained deeply buried in their subconscious or were simply unknown.

Bill Clinton, President of the United States. Famine Monument, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 5, 2000

The 70th anniversary of the famine-genocide marks a turning point. Ukraine has spoken out clearly and officially at the Presidential, Parliamentary and Cabinet levels. A Presidential Decree dated March 20, 2002 established an organizing committee, chaired by the Prime Minister, and set out broad measures for planning and recognizing the anniversary locally, nationally and internationally. A Presidential Address to the People of Ukraine followed November 24, 2002. On November 28, 2002 the Verkhovna Rada passed two Resolutions. The first scheduled a parliamentary hearing for February 12, 2003 in memory of the victims.

The second, "condemning the policy of genocide by the leaders of the Soviet totalitarian regime against the citizens of Ukraine.," scheduled a special memorial meeting of Parliament in May 2003 and recommended to Cabinet a series of permanent measures for publicly commemorating the tragedy, including holding a competition to design a memorial. The President issued a Directive on "Further Measures in Relation to the 70th Anniversary of the Holodomor" December 6, 2002. On February 12, 2003, the President requested Cabinet to consider the establishment of a memorial complex, and the same day, the Verkhovna Rada held its planned parliamentary hearing, and confirmed its intention to hold a special meeting of parliament to formally commemorate the event.

Three months later, on May 14, 2003, Verkhovna Rada held an historic Special Meeting of Parliament commemorating the 70th anniversary of the famine-genocide. Deputy Prime Minister Tabachnyk and Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights, National Minorities and Inter-Nationality Relations Hennady Udovenko delivered compelling speeches. The Communist faction walked out in protest at the beginning of the meeting, declaring that they recognise the existence of the famine but do not accept that it was purposefully organised by the Soviet Union Communist authorities of the period.

The Special Meeting resulted in a Resolution May 15th in the form of an Address to the People of Ukraine on Commemorating the Victims of the 1932-33 Holodomor "organized by the totalitarian regime of Stalin." On June 3, 2003, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts, the City of Kyiv and the State Committee for Construction and Architecture announced a competition for a proposed commemorative monument.

Years of cover up, denial and misinformation preceded the historic May 15th Resolution. The1932-33 famine-genocide was initially documented and exposed to world attention by action outside Ukraine, notably, by scholarly research associated with the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, at the University of Alberta and Harvard University. The widely read book "Harvest of Sorrow" by Robert Conquest, published in 1986, was particularly important in drawing attention to the conscious policy that led to the terror and mind-numbing numbers of lives lost. Conquest collaborated on the book with James Mace, who had done research on the topic at Harvard University.

The book became a strong lead-in to the 1988 report of the Commission on the Ukrainian Famine of the US Congress, for which James Mace was Staff Director. The Commission found that "One or more of the actions specified in the Genocide Convention was taken against the Ukrainians in order to destroy a substantial part of the Ukrainian people and thus to neutralize them politically in the Soviet Union." The findings of International Commissions in Sweden and Belgium on the 1932-33 famine-genocide added to these and other widely reported examinations and condemnations of the tragedy and made it impossible to dismiss, ignore or keep the topic taboo in Ukraine.

In December 1987 the First Secretary of the Ukrainian Communist Party, Volodymyr Shcherbitsky publicly admitted the existence of the famine, giving it the first official Soviet recognition of the event. As the Soviet Union began disintegrating, a Ukrainian Communist Party resolution Feb 7, 1990 blamed Stalin as perpetrator of the famine. The following day Feb 8, 1990, Reuters reported that the Soviet Union government in Moscow had ordered the full details of the Ukrainian famine of 1932-33 to be published. The turmoil following the collapse of the Soviet Union made it convenient to ignore the matter in Moscow, a situation that continues in Russia today.

The November 24, 2002 Address to the People of Ukraine by President Leonid Kuchma speaks of the cruel, slow deaths from starvation of whole villages, and comes to the conclusion.

"We have to admit - it was genocide. A purposeful, meticulously planned genocide against the Ukrainian people. And its is not a small matter that we now can, and are obligated to remember.The communist regime could not put up with the existence of people who were free and independent of it. Free people, whose personal independence was based on working their own land, had to be eliminated. Even executed by famine - no price was considered too high. Blows were delivered methodically and purposefully. First they took the last of what was left, then they dragged out what was hidden, they took people into hostage, barred roads to cities. They ripped out the grain-growing soul of Ukrainians, broke the back of the nation and consciously provoked cannibalism."

Recognising the national cost of the 50-year taboo and denial, at the Special Meeting of Parliament May 14, 2003, Deputy Prime Minister Dmytro Tabachnyk noted, "We must speak out again and again about this horrific tragedy, so that words of deep anguish not only enter the consciousness of everyone, but also touch their hearts." The Deputy Prime Minister referred to the more than 200 hundred thousand items on the famine in central and regional government archives, from which 15 collections of documents, 23 collections of articles printed in magazines and more than 1000 testimonies printed in newspapers have been published with the assistance of scholars and archivists.

Together, he stated, these show that "the famine-terror was introduced as a political mechanism for forcing the Ukrainian society of the day into submission," and that this requires wide public awareness. He emphasised that Ukraine faces the task of ensuring that archives in other countries with related information, especially in Russia, but also in the US and Western Europe, are opened to wide scholarly examination.

Speaking on the issue of international recognition of the 1932-33 terror as an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people, the Deputy Prime Minister was clear. He called for the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the National Archives, with the agreement of the government, to submit to the bodies authorized by the UN to examine the question of genocide, all relevant information accumulated during a decade and a half of scholarly research, which "confirms in our view, that the holodomor in Ukraine was not only a crime against humanity, but also falls under the Convention as an act of genocide."

A translated text of the Resolution of the Special Meeting of the Verkhovna Rada follows.

 

RESOLUTION OF THE VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE
No. 789-IV, 15th of May 2003

 

On the Address to the Ukrainian People from the participants of the Special Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine held on May 14, 2003 to honour the memory of victims of Holodomor (famine-terror) of 1932-1993.

We, the participants of the Special Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, guided by ideals of humanism and social justice, upholding human and civil rights from the standpoint of values common to all humankind, address the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, in this year of a tragic date in our history - the 70th anniversary of the Holodomor organized by the totalitarian Stalinist regime.

The national and international community commemorates the 70th anniversary of this Ukrainian national catastrophe when, probably for the first time in the history of humankind, confiscation of food was used by the state as a weapon of mass destruction against its own people for a political aim. The Holodomor of 1932-1933, which became an inhuman means of liquidating millions of Ukrainians, confirms the criminal nature of the political power of the time.

Brutal seizure of the 1932 year harvest and its shipment beyond the borders of Ukraine, confiscation of all food products from every village family, destruction of temples and churches, massive repressions of the Ukrainian intelligentsia and priesthood - all this was aimed at undermining the Ukrainian national spirit, eradicating its elite and liquidating the economic independence of villagers.

The total extermination of millions of Ukrainian grain-growers by means of an artificially created famine was a deliberate terrorist act of the Stalinist political system. The social foundation of the Ukrainian nation, its centuries-old traditions were ruined, its spiritual culture and ethnic uniqueness were undermined.

For many decades the tragedy of Holodomor of 1932-1933 in Ukraine was not only silenced but also officially disclaimed by the ruling elite of the USSR. Its causes, nature, mechanism of organization and scale were carefully concealed not only from the international community but also from several generations of our compatriots. Yet, attempts to forever shut out the truth about the Holodomor of 1932-1933 and drown it in the flow of time and history failed. The West has known and written about this Ukrainian catastrophe since 1933. In 1988 the US Congress officially recognized the Holodomor of 1932-1933 as genocide against the Ukrainian people, as did the International Commission of Jurists.

As to Ukrainian citizens, the truth about the events of 1932-1933 began to unfold on the eve of the collapse of the USSR. It was then that a breakthrough occurred in the official position of concealing these tragic facts of history.

Today, it can be said with certainty that the first truthful words about the Holodomor of 1932-1933 played a notable role in the national renaissance and became one of the important factors contributing to the attainment of Ukrainian independence.

With this, we believe that in an independent Ukraine the terrible truth about those years must be made public officially by the state, because the Holodomor of 1932-1933 was deliberately organized by the Stalinist regime and should be publicly condemned by Ukrainian society and the international community as one of the largest acts of genocide in world history by virtue of the number of its victims.

We, the participants of the Special Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of May 14, 2003 do so today, by recognizing the Holodomor of 1932-1933 as an act of genocide against the Ukrainian People by evil design of the Stalinist regime.

We believe that designating this catastrophe of the Ukrainian nation as a genocide has a fundamental meaning for stabilizing social-political relations in Ukraine, is an important factor for restoring historic justice and moral healing of several generations from horrible social stresses, is proof of the irreversibility of the process of democratisation of society, and is a severe warning against attempting to establish a new dictatorship in Ukraine or violating the most basic of human rights - the right to live.

Having considered the question of the Holodomor as an act of genocide at the Special Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, we have to a degree fulfilled our civic and patriotic duty before the memory of millions of people and before the younger generation.

At the same time we are deeply aware of the fact, that only after making the official political and legal assessment of this social catastrophe in the history of Ukraine at the highest national level and on behalf of all branches of power in Ukraine, only after fitting annual commemoration of its countless victims, and only after bringing to the international community the fact that this famine is a genocide against the Ukrainian people - only after doing all this, can we call ourselves a full-fledged, civilized Nation.

In the name of the future, let us not forget the past.


Used by  www.ArtUkraine.com  Information Service (ARTUIS) with permission.
The ROMYR Report, Political Analysis Quarterly, Spring-Summer 2003, No. 1 (15), Page 17; Andrew Witer, President, Romyr & Associates, Kyiv, Ukraine; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; New York, New York Myroslaw Kohut, VP, Romyr & Associates, Prorizna 25, Suite 5, Kyiv, Ukraine, 380 44 490 5966,  romyr@romyr.com.uawww.romyr.com;
FOR PERSONAL AND ACADEMIC USE ONLY
 
 

  back