|
From Elaine Monaghan in Washington The Times Online, London
November 27, 2002
IN A radical shake-up of America's foreign aid policy, President Bush is to
make developing countries compete for a huge slab of extra funding.
Countries that apply for the President's "Millennium Challenge Account" and
a share of an extra $5 billion (£3.22 billion) of aid each year will have to
promise to embrace civil rights and open markets, crush corruption and write
business plans to get a slice of the pie.
America gives more foreign aid than any other nation in absolute terms, but
when measured as a share of the economy, America is ranked last out of the
22 leading industrialised nations. Now Mr Bush seeks to increase US foreign
aid by 50 per cent to a total of $15 billion from 2006.
Existing aid is managed by government officials at the US Agency for
International Development. The new account will be led by the Secretary of
State, but run by a chief executive picked by the President and approved by
the Senate.
Eligible countries will have to write proposals for spending the money and
embrace good governance, health and education and pro-business policies.
"Countries that live by these standards will receive more aid from America,"
Mr Bush said in a speech in March.
Experts say that he will ask for about $1 billion and build up to $5 billion
if Congress likes the idea. Countries that would benefit include Ghana,
Bolivia, Tanzania and Sri Lanka, according to Steven Radelet, a former
Treasury Department official in the Clinton and Bush administrations who
works at a Washington think-tank.
He said that the Administration needed to put forward a strategy for
countries that did not qualify, such as Ukraine, which had failed to tackle
corruption, or countries "falling apart at the seams", such as Zimbabwe.
Mr Radelet said that he expected the Administration would keep its promise
not cut into existing funds. There was, however, a risk that Congress could
resort to reducing the funds available for ineligible countries if times
were tough.
The Times, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-493782,00.html
For personal and academic use only
|