|
By Michael
Bociurkiw
MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR
KIEV, Ukraine, Aug. 14 - Foreigners meeting
Yulia Tymoshenko for the first time could be forgiven for harboring
doubts she's one of the wealthiest women in Ukraine and until recently,
one of its most powerful politicians.
SOFT-SPOKEN and serene, the 40-year-old gas
tycoon- turned-politician is revered by many here for taking on
some of the most powerful and entrenched business and political
interests in Ukraine -and virtually ending antiquated arrangements
in the energy sector which siphoned millions of dollars away from
national coffers and into the hands of Ukraine's obscenely rich
oligarchs.
Indeed, in the one year she held the post
of deputy prime minister responsible for the energy sector (before
being ousted), Ukraine's revenue collections from its state-run
electricity industry skyrocketed.
What Tymoshenko accomplished in her short
stint in the government was nothing short of revolutionary: She
eliminated barter trade in electricity by forcing commercial and
institutional customers to stop paying for power with goods - everything
from chickens and steel to tires and vegetables - and instead settle
their bills with cash.
Yulia Tymoshenko
Before the changes, so-called budgetary organizations
were exempt from having their power cut off for non-payment. Tymoshenko's
reforms ended such exemptions and forced business customers to pay
in full, in cash - just like residential customers.
The system was rampant with corruption, according
to one Western diplomat, and allowed middlemen to pocket considerable
kickbacks. And, because huge power bills were not settled, the government
often lacked the cash to pay civil servants their wages and old
people their pensions.
Bringing about such deep reforms in a country
just shedding its character as a centralized, planned economy is
anything but insignificant. This is a land where unprofitable state
run firms resist being broken-up, and where barter trade remains
alive and well in other areas of the sputtering economy.
POLITICAL AMBITION
When Tymoshenko's launched her high profile
clean-up campaign, many people here looked on in disbelief: her
former business partner is the disgraced former Ukrainian Prime
Minister Pavlo Lazarenko -who is behind bars in California awaiting
possible extradition to Ukraine on power abuse charges and reportedly
spiriting billions of dollars out of the county (part of which was
allegedly used to purchase actor Eddie Murphy's mansion).
Advertisement
But most observers here believe Tymoishenko's
conversion from oligarch to do-good reformer was genuine. Despite
attempts to exile her to the political wilderness for good, Tymoshenko
is seen to have a future in Ukrainian politics.
Tymoshenko now heads a new Ukrainian political
movement of a handful of opposition parties, and she makes no secret
of her desire to one day replace scandal-ridden Leonid Kuchma as
president.
"She's one of the few energetic dynamic personalities
in a political scene (and country) full of stolid fatalists," says
one Canadian observer with several years in Kiev. "She gave the
government of (former Prime Minister) Yuschenko backbone and umph."
While the presence of well-heeled business
people in Ukrainian politics is no longer a rarity -several members
of the unicameral parliament, or Verkhovna Rada, are said to be
millionaires - few in this dog-eat-dog arena in their 30s and few
are women.
Western diplomats say that to its credit,
the current government has not dismantled many of the economic reforms
pioneered by Tymoshenko, some have even been given the force of
legislation. Others say policies brought in by Tymoshenko are responsible
for the economy being able to sputter along without much tinkering.
Indeed, Tymoshenko has become a role model
of sorts for the country's disenchanted youth, who according to
one poll see a future abroad - or a job that offers a chance to
earn bribes - as the only way to earn a decent living.
In a survey of its readers earlier this year
the influential newspaper Zerkalo Tyzhnya named Tymoshenko as "the
most influential woman in Ukraine." "The current system has killed
the spirit of many of our young people," Tymoshenko told MSNBC.
"We have to prove to them that there is a better life here now."
OLIGARCH TURNED DO-GOODER?
With parliamentary elections next year and
presidential elections in 2004, Tymoshenko is seen by some diplomats
as one of the few people in the country with the financial backing
and wherewithal to aim for the prime minister or president's office.
She and Yuschenko presided over a government that helped produce
record 6 percent economic growth in 2000.
Her position as deputy prime minister ended
abruptly in January, just as her campaign to introduce deep reforms
into the energy sector began to put the squeeze on business leaders
close to Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma. She was arrested in
mid-February and thrown into prison for several months on corruption
charges.
Tymoshenko's detractors describe her as an
oligarch turned do-gooder.
From 1995 to 1997, she headed one of the
largest energy companies in Ukraine, United Energy Systems. The
gas trading company is said by some to have benefited from a gas-skimming
scheme run by Lazarenko. After Lazarenko left the government, she
joined the pro-reformist Yuschenko then turning against the very
system that minted her as a tycoon.
"She honed in on exactly the right area and
was ruthlessly effective. She demonstrated true insider knowledge,"
says a Kiev-based western diplomat.
Says Adrian Karatnycky of the New York-based
Freedom House: "She felt the moral need to break with past practices
and then worked inside government as a true reformer."
Rather than simply elbowing her way back
to the trough, "she drew the conclusion that the crony system was
at fault, and that bright energetic people like herself could do
as well or better with a level playing field," said another observor.
"Knowing the gas sector skimming schemes
as well as she did made her very effective in dismantling them when
she became deputy prime minister," he said.
Tymoshenko said that within four months of
talking office, she ended blackouts in many towns and villages and
increased the gas sector's contribution to the national treasury
by 10 times.
"With such positive results it was not logical
to get rid of me but they did," she complains. Tymoshenko's demise
is said to have been prompted by harsh complaints from oligarchs
in the energy sector, who in turn put pressure on Kuchma.
Kuchma slams Tymoshenko as a politician obsessed
with popularity polls. "She was mainly working for TV audiences
instead of solving real problems," he recently told Ukrainian journalists.
"Since then, the energy sector has been working much steadier,"
he said, adding that since Tymoshenko was ousted, "revenues in the
electricity sector have grown enormously."
Asked why she left her lucrative business
for an uncertain and dangerous life in the rough and tumble of Ukrainian
politics, Tymoshenko, an economist by training, said she wanted
to change a system that lacked logic and desperately needed new
rules. "Nothing has changed since the Soviet system. The same people
are still in power here," she says.
ECONOMIC DESPAIR
Foreign diplomats have few positive things
to say about the Ukrainian economy, which is poorer than most Asian
economies. In 1999, it's GDP per capita was less than one third
of Russia's, and lower than neighboring Belarus. Its life expectancy
rate is actually falling.
While the capital's historic streets are
crammed with top-of-the-line Mercedes and SUVs, people in such regions
as Kirovohrad live on about $10-a-month.
Foreign businessmen complain of widespread
corruption, crippling red tape, a lack of enforcement of investment
laws and a mentality among government officials that can hardly
be described as foreign investor friendly.
A 1999 survey by the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development found that heads of companies in Ukraine spend up
to 17 percent of their time trying to comply with government regulatory
requirements. (Building and opening a new gas station needs up to
300 separate approvals, and a supermarket about 150).
More foreign businesses are leaving than oming
in. As of October 2000, Ukraine received only $3.7-billion in foreign
investment since independence in 1991. Ukrainian officials say they
were hoping for as much as $ 40-billion in foreign investment in
the five-year period from 1996.
In early 1997 a large number of foreign investors
-including Coca Cola, Cargill, Motorola and Proctor and Gamble were
on the verge of canceling investment projects due to corruption.
The US Congress almost canceled US assistance to Ukraine after complaints
by American businessmen that they were being mistreated.
|