|
ANALYSIS: Inside Ukraine Newsletter, Kyiv, Ukraine, Wed, April 14, 2004
|
KYIV - The long Easter weekend seems to have brought little more in the way
of clarity to the political situation in Ukraine that resulted from the
failure on Thursday of the constitutional reform amendments to gain enough
votes for approval. While the road ahead seems no clearer - and that
situation may obtain for quite some time - information from a variety of
parliamentary and administration sources has begun to at least clarify the
set of circumstances that led to the result they did not expect.
Reports indicate that most of the major pro-presidential players involved
began last Thursday with very high expectations that before the sun set that
day the president would have gotten the 300 votes he needed to gain a
qualified constitutional majority for the amendment package that would strip
the office of the president of much of its power and, at least in theory,
allow him to continue to rule or strongly influence the rule of the country
through a strengthened Verkhovna Rada.
|

Ukrainian opposition deputies cheer as they celebrate the failure of a constitutional reform bill in the parliament hall in Kiev, April 8, 2004 REUTERS/Pool (Click on image to enlarge it)
|
There are widespread reports that the expectations came asunder in day-long
extremely heated and frantic negotiations between top administration
figures, including the president, and highly placed figures in the Rada over
specific concessions that were to be traded for positive votes on the reform
package. Those asking for commitment on certain issues saw this as possibly
the last opportunity they might ever have to gain the advantages they wanted
and were unwilling to compromise without gaining president assent to their
desires.
Also, the successful insistence by Socialist faction head Oleksandr Moroz
that the reforms must carry a further amendment delaying their
implementation until after the presidential elections was thought to have
played a significant role in the lower vote count for the reforms.
In addition to those negotiations in which Viktor Medvedchuk was involved,
there are unconfirmed rumors that the president himself was involved
directly or indirectly with negotiations with Viktor Yushchenko's 'Our
Ukraine' faction on an agreement that could have tipped the presidential
election toward Yushchenko, while at the same time meeting some of Kuchma's
need for peaceful and unfettered retirement.
In fact, some Moscow news outlets have alleged since Thursday that there was
a Kuchma-Yushchenko deal. However, neither side will confirm such a deal and
the evidence suggests that such a deal was not concluded.
What is clear is that the Yushchenko forces have good grounds for their
charges that the pro-presidential forces have concealed something like 10
billion hryvnia in the 2004 budget that could be available to support either
a Kuchma campaign or the campaign of someone who would have Kuchma's
political blessings.
So far the unknowns seem to far outweigh the known factors in the developing
political equation in regard to the presidential race. However, some things
appear certain.
First, there is a consensus that the constitutional reforms as contained in
the package voted on Thursday are dead for this session of the Rada. No one
expects the Social Democrat claims of an improperly operation of the
electronic voting system or any other such stratagem to be successful. Some
matters that require only a simple majority of 226 votes in favor will need
to be dealt with in order to complete election preparations. However, the
major rules and procedures concerning the presidential vote are expected to
be unchanged.
Secondly, if there can be said to be a recognizable winner of Thursday's
vote, it was probably Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych who now has the
added incentive for running a strong campaign because he knows that the
powers of the presidential office will not have been decimated by the reform
amendments.
Finally, the depth's to which Ukraine's major national media have fallen has
been aptly demonstrated by the confusion following the reform vote. All
major outlets, particularly television, have been remarkably silent on the
issue since they seem to have no clear instructions from a somewhat
dispirited and confused presidential administration. Coming to conclusions
and opinions without presidential guidance seems to be a skill that the
complacent major media has lost, at least for the time being.
One newspaper, Kievskiy Telegraf, alleges that on Thursday after the reform
vote, several of the members of the Donetsk-oriented Regions of Ukraine
faction were heard ordering their assistants to make reservations at some of
Kyiv's most luxurious restaurants for very lavish meals, apparently feeling
that the failed reform amendment vote was very good news for the future of
Donetsk and the putative Donetsk standard bearer.
FOR PERSONAL AND ACADEMIC USE ONLY
|