|
|
That prospect is sounding alarms in the EU. Brussels is weighing new import
quotas that would keep out Russian and Ukrainian grain
By Catherine Belton in Moscow
Business Week Online, International Business
New York, New York
November 4, 2002
Just three years ago, Russia was on the breadline, negotiating with the U.S.
for a 5 million-ton food aid package it desperately needed after its second
poor harvest in a row. Now, in a startling about-face, Russia is harvesting
bumper crops and giving established grain exporters, such as the European
Union, Australia, the U.S., and Canada a run for their money. It's even on
track to beat records set by the czarist regime almost a century ago, when
Mother Russia was the world's breadbasket. "Now that other countries have
cut back exports [because of drought], we have a chance to occupy a new
niche in the market," says Yury Ognev, general director of Roskhleboprodukt,
a former state-owned grain trading company bought up by metals magnate
Vladimir O. Potanin last year.
Thanks to good weather and investments by new agribusiness barons such as
Potanin, Russia is likely to match or beat last year's record grain harvest
of 85 million tons. SovEcon, a Moscow agricultural research agency,
estimates that exports in the 2002-03 agricultural year starting July 1 will
rise nearly 50%, to 10 million tons. That would wipe out the 8 million-ton
record set in pre-revolutionary Russia back in 1913, and bring in revenues
of $850 million.
Most of Russia's grain goes to Italy, Greece, Spain, and Northern Africa.
With labor and farming costs less than half of Canada's, Russia is
well-placed to win market share from suppliers in Australia, Canada, and the
EU that have been hit by drought and flooding. Russian milling wheat meets
EU standards. Priced at $85 to $95 per ton, it is $50 below U.S. wheat of
the same quality, and $20 below EU wheat. Russia hopes that the low prices
will cement its hold on new markets.
That prospect is sounding alarms in the EU. Brussels is weighing new import
quotas that would keep out Russian and Ukrainian grain. Such a move raises
the threat of a trade war with Russia. It also could snarl already fraught
negotiations on Russia's entry into the World Trade Organization. "While
European countries are calling on others to be liberal and open, they do the
complete opposite when it touches their own interests," says Russian
Agriculture Minister Alexei Gordeyev. Russia is considering setting quotas
on imports of European meat products in retaliation, he adds.
Despite the two bumper harvests, Russia is far from having the weight it had
in czarist days, when it supplied one-third of global markets. Russia's
exports of 4.2 million tons of wheat last year are far behind the 26 million
tons exported by the U.S. That won't change unless Russia can construct new
port terminals and improve its railroad system to ship surplus grain
cheaply.
That's where the financial muscle of the new barons of Russian agriculture
comes in. Russia's main port on the Black Sea, Novorossisk, is overloaded,
and routes through Baltic ports are getting clogged, too. So Igor Potapenko,
founder of the Moscow-based Razgulyai-Ukrros agriculture holding company, is
in negotiations with the European Bank for Reconstruction & Development over
its possible participation in his project to complete a $14 million grain
terminal on the Azov Sea by next year. "Russia's potential as a world player
on the grain market is huge," says Potapenko. Roskhleboprodukt plans to
spend up to $100 million on a new deepwater terminal at Novorossisk, as well
as terminals on the Azov and Baltic Seas.
So far, so good. But how long can Russia hold on to new markets after a
decade of farm-sector neglect? Most new agribusiness owners are starting to
plough millions of dollars into equipment and fertilizer. But the really big
bucks won't come in until the government gets a new farm insurance program
off the ground. Meanwhile, Russia will continue to enjoy its edge in cheap
labor and abundant land. By European standards, Russian farmland currently
is underfertilized by a factor of ten. If farmers just increased their use
of fertilizer, output would soar. The czars would be proud.
Business Week Magazine, New York, New York
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_44/b3806081.htm
For personal and academic use only
ArtUkraine Information Service (ARTUIS)
Kyiv, Ukraine and Washington, D.C.
E. Morgan Williams, Publisher
ArtUkraine@starpower.net
http://www.ArtUkraine.com
|
|